Home > Worked examples > ModelFleet AI

Fictional worked example

Evidence your own AIGate: Investor and board diligence

Because the record carried its own change history, retrained models did not reset the evidence to zero.

Evidence-gate card

ModelFleet AI

Fictional company, real review pattern.

Gate

Investor and board diligence

Reviewer

Investment committee and board

Trigger

Fundraising diligence and a board decision file

Evidence requested

Deployment authority, model validation, retrain history, oversight settings and evidence of what changed between model versions.

Situation

ModelFleet AI provides credit-decisioning models to lenders. It is raising, and the investor's diligence turns to the governance an acquirer or investor would inherit. The board wants a decision file it can stand behind.

Before Custara

The evidence sits across data science, legal and compliance. The models retrain often, so hand-assembled evidence goes stale between the retrain and the review, and each cycle starts close to scratch.

What Custara prepared

Custara prepared one current record per model perimeter, with deployment authority, model validation, retrain history and oversight settings held in the same file.

GER-00X · FICTIONAL

Scope: investor and board diligence · Evidence period: current cycle

Record map

  • Model validation records, status: present
  • Deployment authority and sign-off, status: present
  • Oversight settings, status: present
  • Material-change register, status: present
  • Bias-testing evidence for one model, status: needs source

Fictional record. Status reflects record completeness, not governance judgement. Not a score, an assessment or a certification.

Gap visible

Bias-testing evidence for one model still needs source. The gap is visible before the committee asks for it.

Shown, not hidden. No score state.

Exported pack

A controlled diligence pack for the investment committee and a board decision file for the same review window.

Reused later

The record can be reused for later regulator, customer and board reviews without rebuilding it from scratch.

Boundary

Custara showed what was current and what predated a change. The board and investors decided what that meant.

The record showed which evidence was current and which predated a change. Whether that governance was good enough was the board's call, not Custara's.

Custara prepares the evidence record. It does not assess, score, classify, certify, rate, advise or recommend.

Register interest

Facing this gate?